george was … george was definitely waaaaay into the wah wah during this period. all over the let it be movie, too. i’m a bit on the fence about his use of it, to be honest…
Doode! Love the … Doode! Love the Beats, but Joe Cocker, sucky voice and wasted and whatever other syndrome he might have, still lends the only soul ever offered to this song. Honestly.
not true, i think … not true, i think his voice is beautiful, and its still great and i doubt hes high now adays, now his woodstock era is a different story, he was prolly standing on the moon but i think hes stiil great
thats true, but … thats true, but look at amy winehouse – she’s just some crazy drug addict who hides behind the profession ’singer’. sure, she was pretty good in the studio, but live she was terrible! and everyone loves her!
but i’d agree with you in that joe cocker’s version is as good
First off, you have … First off, you have obviously never heard the version off Abbey Road, because that version OWNS Joe Cocker…his voice sucks and his only claim to fame is the fact that he’s always high or wasted when he performs.
BTW. I just checked … BTW. I just checked out his royal highness chadgarland’s channel. I cannot believe the moron he must be to post the idiotic crap he did.
What a waste of space. It’s too bad that folks like that are around breathing up the air and putting their awful feet all over the ground.
But what can you expect from some dolt who begins a sentence with the word ‘Dude’?
LOL. I heard that … LOL. I heard that Clapton gave George a wah wah, which he tried using on nearly every other song at the time, sort of like how everything had Rickenbacker 12 string on it for awhile. I’m thankful all his tries didn’t make the final mix though.
The Beatles Anthology 3
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
George don’t need …
George don’t need no wah wah!
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
OMG this version is …
OMG this version is SO much better! Listen to that Wah Wah!!
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
george was …
george was definitely waaaaay into the wah wah during this period. all over the let it be movie, too. i’m a bit on the fence about his use of it, to be honest…
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Is it John singing …
Is it John singing the chorus melody??
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Heath Ledger looks …
Heath Ledger looks like John Lennon
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
i like the original …
i like the original version better.
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
@philosufficate haha
@philosufficate haha
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
i love this version …
i love this version!!!
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
I love that version …
I love that version… It’s so laid back and just… cool!
The Beatlesare my heroes!
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
that picture paired …
that picture paired with this version of the song just about made my life.
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
In this pic they …
In this pic they look like The Beatles thank god.
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
damn the Beatles …
the Beatles look baked in this pic!!
very fitting for this version of one of the best trax off abbey road
yesss!!
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Doode! Love the …
Doode! Love the Beats, but Joe Cocker, sucky voice and wasted and whatever other syndrome he might have, still lends the only soul ever offered to this song. Honestly.
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
isn’t that paul …
isn’t that paul talking about variation in the end bit?
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
not true, i think …
not true, i think his voice is beautiful, and its still great and i doubt hes high now adays, now his woodstock era is a different story, he was prolly standing on the moon but i think hes stiil great
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
what the is …
what the is paul doing to ringo in this picture? lol
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
thats true, but …
thats true, but look at amy winehouse – she’s just some crazy drug addict who hides behind the profession ’singer’. sure, she was pretty good in the studio, but live she was terrible! and everyone loves her!
but i’d agree with you in that joe cocker’s version is as good
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
First off, you have …
First off, you have obviously never heard the version off Abbey Road, because that version OWNS Joe Cocker…his voice sucks and his only claim to fame is the fact that he’s always high or wasted when he performs.
Retard
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
This version is …
This version is just so high! Really awesome. Beatles forever
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Joe cocker does …
Joe cocker does this sooooo much better…..
copy and paste this into youtube
022 Joe Cocker She came in through the bathroom window
before you comment and say the beatles version is better…..watch joe cockers version first….
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
BTW. I just checked …
BTW. I just checked out his royal highness chadgarland’s channel. I cannot believe the moron he must be to post the idiotic crap he did.
What a waste of space. It’s too bad that folks like that are around breathing up the air and putting their awful feet all over the ground.
But what can you expect from some dolt who begins a sentence with the word ‘Dude’?
. . .yep, about that much.
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
LOL. I heard that …
LOL. I heard that Clapton gave George a wah wah, which he tried using on nearly every other song at the time, sort of like how everything had Rickenbacker 12 string on it for awhile. I’m thankful all his tries didn’t make the final mix though.
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
wah wah waht did …
wah wah waht did you say?
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
nor yours! isn’t …
nor yours! isn’t life grand!?
as John said on the train in A Hard Day’s Night: “ahhh, the blessed freedom of it all!”
December 19th, 2009 at 10:21 am
dude no one cares …
dude no one cares about your opinion.